S.2090 / 105th Congress

NRC Fairness in Funding Act of 1998

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 433.

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · May 18, 1998

NRC Fairness in Funding Act of 1998 - Amends the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 to extend through FY 2003 Nuclear Regulatory Commission authority (NRC) to assess and collect user fees and annual charges. Reformulates the aggregate annual charges collected from all licensees to factor in the costs of certain NRC activities for FY 1999 and thereafter. Requires the NRC to take specified considerations into account when it determines which costs of its activities would be inequitable to include in licensee assessments. Sets a ceiling for such maximum excluded costs.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Sen. Chafee, John H. [R-RI] · R–RI

Committees

Environment and Public Works Committee

4 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

Jun 25, 1998
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 433.
Jun 25, 1998
Committee on Environment and Public Works. Reported to Senate by Senator Chafee without amendment. With written report No. 105-223.
Jun 25, 1998
Committee on Environment and Public Works. Reported to Senate by Senator Chafee without amendment. With written report No. 105-223.
May 21, 1998
Committee on Environment and Public Works. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.
May 18, 1998
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
May 18, 1998
Introduced in Senate

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Reported to Senate · Jun 25, 1998 Formatted Text PDF
Introduced in Senate · May 18, 1998 Formatted Text PDF

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.2090 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss S.2090, 105th Congress: NRC Fairness in Funding Act of 1998

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/105th-congress/senate-bill/2090

Text version to examine: Reported to Senate · 1998-06-25.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/105/bills/s2090/BILLS-105s2090rs.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2026-09-08T18:12:22Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze S.2090 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.2090 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss S.2090, 105th Congress: NRC Fairness in Funding Act of 1998

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/105th-congress/senate-bill/2090

Text version to examine: Reported to Senate · 1998-06-25.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/105/bills/s2090/BILLS-105s2090rs.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2026-09-08T18:12:22Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine S.2090 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.2090 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss S.2090, 105th Congress: NRC Fairness in Funding Act of 1998

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/105th-congress/senate-bill/2090

Text version to examine: Reported to Senate · 1998-06-25.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/105/bills/s2090/BILLS-105s2090rs.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2026-09-08T18:12:22Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine S.2090 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.2090 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss S.2090, 105th Congress: NRC Fairness in Funding Act of 1998

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/105th-congress/senate-bill/2090

Text version to examine: Reported to Senate · 1998-06-25.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/105/bills/s2090/BILLS-105s2090rs.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2026-09-08T18:12:22Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine S.2090 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.