PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Referred to the Subcommittee on Native American Affairs.
Congressional Research Service
Version 35 · Passed Senate amended · Oct 6, 1994
Indian Child Protection and Family Violence Prevention Act Amendments of 1994 - Amends the Indian Child Protection and Family Violence Prevention Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to establish a grant program for tribal child abuse registry systems. Authorizes appropriations. Requires Federal law enforcement agencies that investigate child abuse in Indian country to provide appropriate Indian tribal law enforcement agencies with such information. Directs the Secretary to: (1) establish medical examination use guidelines in connection with child abuse reports; and (2) issue character investigation standards. Authorizes FY 1995 through 2005 appropriations for character investigation and related activities. Extends the authorization of appropriations through FY 2005 for Indian child abuse treatment grants. Eliminates grant ceilings. Establishes an Indian Family Violence Grant program. Authorizes FY 1995 through 2005 appropriations. Extends the authorization of appropriations through FY 2005 for: (1) Indian child resource and family service centers; and (2) the Indian child protection and family violence prevention program.
People & committees
Sen. McCain, John [R-AZ] · R–AZ
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Native American Affairs.
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Received in the House.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Passed Senate with an amendment by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S14407)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Voice Vote.(consideration: CR S14407)
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 707.
Committee on Indian Affairs. Reported to Senate by Senator Inouye with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. With written report No. 103-394.
Committee on Indian Affairs. Reported to Senate by Senator Inouye with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. With written report No. 103-394.
Committee on Indian Affairs. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
Committee on Indian Affairs. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 103-811.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S5191-5193)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Jun 20, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.2075 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.2075 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.2075 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.2075 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.