PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

A bill to designate the United States courthouse that is scheduled to be constructed in Concord, New Hampshire, as the "Warren B. Rudman United States Courthouse", and for other purposes.

Became Public Law No: 103-404.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · May 4, 1994

Designates the United States courthouse that is scheduled to be constructed in Concord, New Hampshire, as the Warren B. Rudman United States Courthouse.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Smith, Bob [R-NH] · R–NH

Committees

  • Transportation and Infrastructure Committee
  • Environment and Public Works Committee
24 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Became Public Law No: 103-404.

  2. Became Public Law No: 103-404.

  3. Signed by President.

  4. Signed by President.

  5. Presented to President.

  6. Presented to President.

  7. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  8. Senate agreed to the House amendments by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR 10/7/94 S14960)

  9. Resolving differences -- Senate actions: Senate agreed to the House amendments by Voice Vote.(consideration: CR 10/7/94 S14960)

  10. Message on House action received in Senate and at the desk: House amendments to Senate bill.

  11. The title of the measure was amended. Agreed to without objection.

  12. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  13. On passage Passed without objection.

  14. Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed without objection.

  15. Considered by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR H11341-11342)

  16. Mr. Traficant asked unanimous consent to discharge from committee and consider.

  17. Committee on Public Works + Transportation discharged.

  18. Committee on Public Works + Transportation discharged.

  19. Referred to the Subcommittee on Public Buildings and Grounds.

  20. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  21. Referred to the House Committee on Public Works + Transportation.

  22. Received in the House.

  23. Passed Senate without amendment by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S11972)

  24. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Voice Vote.(consideration: CR S11972)

  25. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 568.

  26. Committee on Environment and Public Works. Reported to Senate by Senator Baucus without amendment. Without written report.

  27. Committee on Environment and Public Works. Reported to Senate by Senator Baucus without amendment. Without written report.

  28. Committee on Environment and Public Works. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.

  29. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.

  30. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S5188-5189)

  31. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.2073 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.2073 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.2073 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.2073 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources