PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Southern Ute and Colorado Intergovernmental Agreement Implementation Act of 2002

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 767.

Official summary

Version 80 · Reported to Senate without amendment · Nov 19, 2002

Southern Ute and Colorado Intergovernmental Agreement Implementation Act of 2002 - Authorizes the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to treat the Southern Ute Indian Tribe in the same manner as a State under Clean Air Act administrative provisions for air program applications the Tribe submits to implement and carry out the Intergovernmental Agreement between the Tribe and the State of Colorado in a manner consistent with the Clean Air Act. Makes the program applicable, upon its approval, to all air resources within the exterior boundaries of the Southern Ute Indian Reservation.Provides for compliance enforcement by the Southern Ute Indian Tribe/State of Colorado Environmental Commission and judicial review of the Commission's decisions.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Campbell, Ben Nighthorse [R-CO] · R–CO

Committees

  • Environment and Public Works Committee
  • Indian Affairs Committee
1 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 767.

  2. Committee on Environment and Public Works. Reported by Senator Jeffords without amendment. With written report No. 107-346.

  3. Committee on Environment and Public Works. Reported by Senator Jeffords without amendment. With written report No. 107-346.

  4. Committee on Environment and Public Works. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.

  5. Committee on Indian Affairs. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 107-614.

  6. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.

  7. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S2287-2288)

  8. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.2065 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.2065 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.2065 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.2065 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources