PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Apr 26, 1994
Amends the Internal Revenue Code to require the transfer of specified amounts equivalent to the motorboat fuel taxes received during a year by the Highway Trust Fund to the land and water conservation fund. Extends the authority to make amounts in the Boat Safety Account available for State recreational boating safety programs. Amends the Dingell-Johnson Sport Fish Restoration Act to require for FY 1995 through 1998 the transfer of specified amounts from the Sport Fish Restoration Account to the Boat Safety Account of the Aquatic Resources Trust Fund for recreational boating safety programs. Earmarks specified amounts for qualified projects under the Clean Vessel Act of 1992. Transfers unobligated amounts for recreational boating safety programs. Amends Federal shipping law to make a specified amount of funds from the Boat Safety Account available for expenditures out of the operating expenses account of the Coast Guard for services provided by it for recreational boating safety, including services provided by the Coast Guard Auxiliary. Authorizes expenditure of the balance of amounts transferred each year to the Boat Safety Account for State recreational boating safety programs.
People & committees
Sen. Gorton, Slade [R-WA] · R–WA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S4891-4892)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Jan 14, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.2052 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.2052 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.2052 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.2052 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.