PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Stem Cell Research Act of 2000

Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S9448)

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Jan 31, 2000

Stem Cell Research Act of 2000 - Amends the Public Health Service Act to authorize the Secretary of Health and Human Services to conduct, support, or fund research on or utilizing human embryos for purposes of generating embryonic stem cells only in accordance with this Act.Requires, for purposes of carrying out research, that human embryonic stem cells be derived only from embryos that otherwise would be discarded that have been donated from in- vitro fertilization clinics with the written informed consent of the progenitors. Prohibits human embryonic stem cell research from resulting in the creation of human embryos or in the reproductive cloning of a human being.Makes it unlawful for any person receiving Federal funds to knowingly acquire, receive, or otherwise transfer any human gametes or embryos for valuable consideration if such action affects interstate commerce.Directs the Secretary, in conjunction with the Director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), to issue guidelines governing human embryonic stem cell research. Requires such guidelines to ensure that: (1) all Federal research protocols and consent forms involving human embryonic stem cell research must be reviewed and approved by an institutional review board; and (2) such board is empowered to make determinations as to whether proposed research is in accordance with NIH Guidelines for Research Involving Human Pluripotent Stem Cells.Requires the Secretary to report annually to the appropriate congressional committees on activities carried out under this Act.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Specter, Arlen [R-PA] · R–PA

Committees

  • Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee
2 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S9448)

  2. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text of measure as introduced: CR S151)

  3. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S150-151)

  4. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Aug 20, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.2015 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.2015 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.2015 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.2015 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources