PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

A bill to improve the administration of the Women's Rights National Historical Park in the State of New York, and for other purposes.

By Senator Johnston from Committee on Energy and Natural Resources filed written report. Report No. 103-420.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Mar 25, 1994

Adds specified lands to the Women's Rights National Historical Park in New York. Provides that funds available to the Secretary of the Interior for the Park shall be available to establish and administer education, research facilities, and programs on the history of women's rights within the Park pursuant to cooperative agreements with appropriate public or private entities. Extends the Women's Rights National Historical Park Advisory Commission to the year 2005. Increases the limit on the authorization of appropriations for the Park.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Moynihan, Daniel Patrick [D-NY] · D–NY

Committees

  • Energy and Natural Resources Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. By Senator Johnston from Committee on Energy and Natural Resources filed written report. Report No. 103-420.

    2. By Senator Johnston from Committee on Energy and Natural Resources filed written report. Report No. 103-420.

    3. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 646.

    4. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported to Senate by Senator Johnston with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.

    5. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported to Senate by Senator Johnston with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.

    6. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.

    7. Subcommittee on Parks, Preservation and Recreation. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 103-942.

    8. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources requested executive comment from Department of the Interior, and Office of Management and Budget.

    9. Referred to Subcommittee on Public Lands, National Parks.

    10. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

    11. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S3983-3984)

    12. Introduced in Senate

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze S.2001 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine S.2001 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine S.2001 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine S.2001 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources