PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Yuma Crossing National Heritage Area Act of 1999

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 679.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Nov 19, 1999

Yuma Crossing National Heritage Area Act of 1999 - Establishes the Yuma Crossing National Heritage Area in Yuma, Arizona. Requires the Secretary of the Interior to enter into a compact with the Yuma Crossing National Heritage Area Board of Directors (management entity) that shall include information relating to Heritage Area objectives and management.Requires the management entity to develop and submit to the Secretary for approval a management plan for the Heritage Area. Describes duties of the management entity, including to: (1) assist governments and organizations in increasing public awareness, and developing recreational resources, of the Heritage Area; and (2) encourage economic viability in the Heritage Area.Prohibits the management entity from using Federal funds received under this Act to acquire real property or interests in real property. Authorizes the management entity to use Federal funds on non-federally owned property to further this Act's purposes.Authorizes the Secretary, on request of the management entity, to provide technical and financial assistance to the management entity to develop and implement the management plan.Terminates the Secretary's authority to provide assistance under this Act on September 30, 2015.Authorizes appropriations. Limits Federal funding to 50 percent of the total cost of any assistance or grant under this Act.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. McCain, John [R-AZ] · R–AZ

Committees

  • Energy and Natural Resources Committee
1 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 679.

  2. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported by Senator Murkowski with an amendment. With written report No. 106-340.

  3. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported by Senator Murkowski with an amendment. With written report No. 106-340.

  4. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported with an amendment favorably.

  5. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

  6. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.1998 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.1998 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.1998 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.1998 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources