PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry. (text: CR S4570-4579)
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Jun 26, 2019
Safe Food Act of 2019
This bill establishes the Food Safety Administration (FSA) as an independent agency to administer and enforce food safety laws.
The functions of specified federal agencies that relate to the administration or enforcement of food safety laws are transferred to the FSA.
Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.
The FSA is directed to
promulgate regulations to protect the food supply from contamination;
implement federal food safety inspection, labeling, enforcement, and research efforts to protect the public health;
develop consistent and science-based standards for safe food;
prioritize federal food safety efforts and deployment of resources to achieve the greatest benefit in reducing foodborne illness;
administer a national food safety program based on an analysis of the hazards associated with different foods and the processing of different foods;
require that all food and feed facilities register before operation or importation of food, feed, or ingredients;
establish an accreditation system for foreign governments seeking to certify food for importation to the United States;
establish requirements for tracing food and animals from point of origin to retail sale;
establish and administer a food safety technology program to foster innovations with the potential to improve food safety;
maintain or access an active surveillance system of food and epidemiological evidence;
establish a sampling system to monitor contaminants in food;
rank categories of food based on their health hazard;
establish a national public education campaign on food safety; and
conduct research relating to food safety.
This bill includes provisions regarding prohibited acts, recall authority, penalties for violations of food safety laws, whistle-blower protection, and civil actions.
People & committees
Sen. Durbin, Richard J. [D-IL] · D–IL
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry. (text: CR S4570-4579)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Jan 13, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.1995 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.1995 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.1995 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.1995 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.