PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Derivatives Market Reform Act of 1999

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Nov 18, 1999

Derivatives Market Reform Act of 1999 - Title I: Derivatives Dealers - Amends the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to prescribe procedural guidelines for the mandatory registration of derivatives dealers. Grants the Securities and Exchange Commission(SEC) enforcement powers, including examination of such dealers' records.Title II: Broker-Dealer Oversight Reforms - Authorizes a national securities exchange and a registered securities association to adopt and implement rules governing members engaged in derivatives transactions.(Sec. 203) Requires SEC financial responsibility rules to include the mandatory maintenance of sufficient capital levels by any derivatives dealer that is a material person associated with a registered broker or dealer (after taking into account the financial activities, customary sources of capital, and the credit risk and aggregate leverage of such derivatives dealer).(Sec. 205) Sets forth recordkeeping and reporting requirements governing persons associated with brokers and dealers of government or municipal securities, including disclosure of such persons': (1) monitoring of financial and operational risks to associated brokers and dealers; and (2) financial and securities activities, and customary sources of capital and funding.(Sec. 207) Directs the SEC to take all actions necessary to establish regulations pertaining to large trader reporting requirements.(Sec. 208) Grants rulemaking powers under this Act to: (1) the SEC; (2) the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System; and (3) other designated agencies. Amends the Market Reform Act of 1990 to reinstate certain annual reporting requirements.Title III: Hedge Fund Reporting - Amends the Investment Company Act of 1940 to require unregistered hedge funds to submit quarterly status reports to the SEC.(Sec. 301) Instructs the SEC to transmit copies of such reports to specified regulatory agencies and to the public.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Dorgan, Byron L. [D-ND] · D–ND

Committees

  • Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking.

    2. Introduced in Senate

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

    Source last updated: Aug 20, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze S.1968 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine S.1968 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine S.1968 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine S.1968 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources