PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

A bill to allow the National Park Service to acquire certain land for addition to the Wilderness Battlefield, as previously authorized by law, by purchase or exchange as well as by donation.

By Senator Murkowski from Committee on Energy and Natural Resources filed written report. Report No. 105-387.

Official summary

Version 01 · Reported to Senate with amendment(s) · Sep 25, 1998

Amends Federal law to allow acquisition of specified lands for the Fredericksburg and Spotsylvania County Battlefields Memorial National Military Park (Wilderness Battlefield), Virginia, by purchase or exchange as well as by donation (as currently). Specifies one parcel which may be acquired by donation only.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Warner, John [R-VA] · R–VA

Committees

  • Energy and Natural Resources Committee
7 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. By Senator Murkowski from Committee on Energy and Natural Resources filed written report. Report No. 105-387.

  2. By Senator Murkowski from Committee on Energy and Natural Resources filed written report. Report No. 105-387.

  3. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 618.

  4. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported to Senate by Senator Murkowski with an amendment. Without written report.

  5. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported to Senate by Senator Murkowski with an amendment. Without written report.

  6. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported with an amendment favorably.

  7. Subcommittee on Parks, Preservation and Recreation. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 105-801.

  8. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources requested executive comment from Department of the Interior, OMB.

  9. Referred to Subcommittee on Parks, Preservation and Recreation.

  10. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

  11. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.1960 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.1960 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.1960 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.1960 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources