PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1997

Indefinitely postponed by Senate by Unanimous Consent.

Official summary

Version 34 · Indefinitely postponed in Senate · Jul 30, 1996

TABLE OF CONTENTS: Title I: Department of Defense-Civil Title II: Department of the Interior Title III: Department of Energy Title IV: Independent Agencies Title V: General Provisions Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1997 - Title I: Department of Defense-Civil - Makes appropriations to the Department of the Army and its Corps of Engineers for FY 1997 for: (1) authorized civil functions of the Department of the Army relating to rivers and harbors, flood control, beach erosion, and related purposes; (2) expenses necessary for the collection and study of information related to such purposes; (3) the prosecution of authorized water development and related projects; (4) certain flood control projects on the Mississippi River and its tributaries; (5) water development projects operation and maintenance; (6) regulatory programs; (7) flood control and coastal emergencies; (8) general expenses. (Sec. 101) Specifies modifications to the Arkansas City, Kansas, Elk Creek Dam, Oregon, Moorefield, West Virginia, and Grays Landing Lock and Dam, Monongahela River, Pennsylvania, flood control projects. (Sec. 105) Requires certain flood control measures in specified parts of Kentucky, Virginia, and West Virginia to prevent future losses that would occur from a flood equal in magnitude to the April 1977 level by providing protection from such level or the 100-year frequency event, whichever is greater. (Sec. 106) Authorizes the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Corps of Engineers, to reprogram, obligate, and expend necessary additional sums to continue certain construction projects until completion. (Sec. 107) Directs the Secretary of the Army in FY 1997 to advertise for competitive bid at least 7.5 million cubic yards of the hopper dredge volume accomplished with Government owned dredges in FY 1996. (Sec. 108) Directs the Corps of Engineers to complete the Charleston Riverfront (HADDAD) Park Project, West Virginia, on a 50-50 cost basis with the City. Title II: Department of the Interior - Makes FY 1997 appropriations to the Department of the Interior for: (1) the Central Utah Project; (2) the Bureau of Reclamation; (3) general investigation of proposed Federal reclamation projects; (4) project construction and rehabilitation; (5) project operation and maintenance; (6) Bureau of Reclamation Loan Program Account; (7) the Central Valley Project Restoration Fund; and (8) general administrative expenses and special funds. Title III: Department of Energy - Makes appropriations to the Department of Energy (DOE) for FY 1997 for: (1) energy supply, research, and development activities; (2) uranium supply and enrichment activities; (3) the Uranium Enrichment Decontamination and Decommissioning Fund; (4) general DOE science and research activities; (5) the Nuclear Waste Disposal Fund; (6) atomic energy defense weapons activities; (7) defense environmental restoration and waste management; (8) other DOE defense activities; (9) defense nuclear waste disposal; (10) DOE administration expenses; (11) Office of the Inspector General; (12) the various geographical power marketing administrations of DOE (including specified costs for the hydroelectric facilities at the Falcon and Amistad Dams); and (13) the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Requires certain guidelines to require, at a minimum, the presence of an adequate number of security guards carrying side arms at all times to ensure maintenance of security at the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant, Kentucky, and the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant, Ohio. Amends the USEC Privatization Act to require the United States Enrichment Corporation to pay employee and agency contributions to the Thrift Savings Fund for employees who elect to retain coverage under the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS). Directs the Secretary of Energy to give the President and the Congress a viability assessment of the Yucca Mountain site for nuclear waste disposal. Authorizes the Secretary to use DOE administration funds to offer employees voluntary separation incentives. Reserves specified amounts of defense environmental restoration and waste management for: (1) demonstration of stir-melter technology; and (2) electrometallurgical treatment of spent nuclear fuel. Title IV: Independent Agencies - Makes appropriations for FY 1997 for: (1) the Appalachian Regional Commission; (2) the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board; (3) the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC); (4) the NRC Office of the Inspector General; (5) the Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board; (6) the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA); (7) the Delaware River Basin Commission; (8) the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin; and (9) the Susquehanna River Basin Commission. Prohibits the availability of TVA funds under this Act for detailed engineering and design or construction of a replacement for Chickamauga Lock and Dam on the Tennessee River System. Title V: General Provisions - Declares the sense of the Congress that all equipment and products bought with funds under this Act should be American-made. Requires each Federal agency to give notice of this policy to any entity to which it provides financial assistance or contracts. (Sec. 502) Directs the Secretary of the Interior to extend the construction repayment and water service contracts for the specified Bostwick District (both Kansas and Missouri portions) and the Frenchman-Cambridge District, Missouri River Basin Project, as components of the Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. (Sec. 504) Amends the Northwest Power Planning and Conservation Act to direct the Northwest Power Planning Council to: (1) appoint an Independent Scientific Review Panel to review projects proposed to be funded through that portion of the Bonneville Power Administration's (BPA) annual fish and wildlife budget that implements the Council's annual fish and wildlife program; and (2) establish Scientific Peer Review Groups to assist the Panel in making its recommendations to the Council for such projects. (Sec. 505) Directs the Site Manager at the Hanford Reservation, Washington, to provide the State of Oregon an opportunity to review and comment upon certain information, relating to certain remedial actions, that the Site Manager provides the State under the Hanford Tri-Party Agreement. (Sec. 506) Sets forth the sense of the Senate regarding the State of Oregon's authority to enter into a memorandum of understanding with the State of Washington, or with that State and the Site Manager of the Hanford Reservation, in order to address issues of mutual concern to such States regarding the Hanford Reservation. (Sec. 507) Directs the Secretary of the Interior, for purposes of providing emergency drought relief, to defer principal and interest payments under specified project contracts by: (1) the city of Corpus Christi, Texas, and the Nueces River Authority; and (2) the Canadian River Municipal Water Authority. (Sec. 509) Amends the Solid Waste Disposal Act to add provisions relating to: (1) interstate transportation of municipal solid waste; and (2) State and local government control of movement of municipal solid waste and recyclable material. (Sec. 510) Expresses the sense of the Senate requiring the President to direct the Office of U.S. Trade Representative and the Department of Commerce to establish a system to provide for unilateral U.S. Government calculation and publication of the foreign share of the Japanese semiconductor market, according to the formula set forth in the current United States-Japan Semiconductor Trade Agreement, if a new agreement is not concluded by July 31, 1996, that: (1) ensures continued use of such formula; and (2) provides for continuation of current measures to deter renewed dumping of semiconductors in the United States and in third country markets.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Domenici, Pete V. [R-NM] · R–NM

Committees

  • Appropriations Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Indefinitely postponed by Senate by Unanimous Consent.

    2. Senate passed companion measure H.R. 3816 in lieu of this measure by Yea-Nay Vote. 93-6. Record Vote No: 253. (consideration: CR S9115)

      Senate roll call 253 · Individual votes
    3. Senate incorporated this measure in H.R. 3816 as an amendment.

    4. Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S9085-9104)

    5. Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S9007, S9011-9015, S9038-9050, S9052-9061)

    6. Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S8965-8972, S8974, S8977-8978, S8980-8988)

    7. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 496.

    8. Committee on Appropriations. Original measure reported to Senate by Senator Domenici. With written report No. 104-320.

    9. Committee on Appropriations. Original measure reported to Senate by Senator Domenici. With written report No. 104-320.

    10. Committee on Appropriations ordered to be reported an original measure.

    11. Introduced in Senate

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    Source last updated: Aug 21, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze S.1959 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine S.1959 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine S.1959 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine S.1959 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources