Clifford P. Hansen Federal Courthouse Conveyance Act
Became Public Law No: 113-194.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 49 · Public Law · Nov 26, 2014
(This measure has not been amended since it was passed by the Senate on September 9, 2014. The summary of that version is repeated here.)
Clifford P. Hansen Federal Courthouse Conveyance Act - Directs the Administrator of General Services (GSA) to offer to convey to Teton County, Wyoming, the parcel of land located at 145 East Simpson Street, Jackson, Wyoming, and the building on such land known as the Clifford P. Hansen Federal Courthouse.
Directs the Administrator to require the County to pay: (1) nominal consideration for the parcel, and (2) fair market value for the building.
Allows the Administrator, in lieu of the County's payment for the building, to accept any credits or waivers against lease payments, amounts expended by the County under facility maintenance agreements, or other charges for the continued occupancy or use by the federal government.
Requires the deed for conveyance to include a covenant providing that the parcel and building will be for public use.
Requires proceeds from the conveyance to be paid into the Federal Buildings Fund.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H7913)
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H7913)
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on S. 1934.
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H7913-7914)
Mr. Meadows moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.
Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
Received in the House.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Passed Senate with an amendment and an amendment to the Title by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S5460-5461; text as passed Senate: CR S5460)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment and an amendment to the Title by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S5460-5461; text as passed Senate: CR S5460)
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 423.
Committee on Environment and Public Works. Reported by Senator Boxer with an amendment in the nature of a substitute and an amendment to the title. Without written report.
Committee on Environment and Public Works. Reported by Senator Boxer with an amendment in the nature of a substitute and an amendment to the title. Without written report.
Committee on Environment and Public Works. Ordered to be reported with amendments favorably.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Bill text & related measures
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze S.1934 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine S.1934 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine S.1934 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine S.1934 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.