Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Nov 10, 1999
Money Laundering Abatement Act of 1999 - Amends Federal law regarding monetary transactions to prohibit a depository institution or branch of a foreign bank from: (1) opening or maintaining an account in the United States for a foreign entity or representative unless a record is maintained in the United States that identifies by verifiable name and account number each person having an ownership interest in the account, or some or all of the share of such foreign entity are publicly traded; and (2) opening or maintaining a correspondent account in the United States for a foreign banking institution or correspondent bank relationship with a foreign banking institution that is either organized under the laws of a foreign jurisdiction, and is not subject to comprehensive oversight on a consolidated basis in such jurisdiction.(Sec. 3) Requires a financial institution to comply within 48 hours with a Federal banking agency request for anti- money laundering information.(Sec. 4) Instructs the Secretary of the Treasury to prescribe regulations governing maintenance of concentration accounts by financial institutions to ensure that such accounts are not used to prevent association of the identity of an individual customer with the movement of funds of which the customer is the direct or beneficial owner.(Sec. 5) Amends the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to require each depository institution engaging in private banking to establish due diligence procedures for ongoing review of private banking customer accounts.(Sec. 6) Amends Federal criminal law to: (1) expand the designations of unlawful laundering of monetary instruments; (2) impose a fine and imprisonment for false statements to financial institutions concerning the identity of a customer; and (3) grant district courts jurisdiction over any foreign person that commits a financial transaction offense in the United States, including court issuance of a pretrial restraining order.(Sec. 8) Authorizes appropriations for the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the Department of the Treasury to implement an automated database to alert law enforcement officials if Currency Transaction Reports or Suspicious Activity Reports disclose patterns of illegal activity, including multiple Currency Transaction Reports or Suspicious Activity Reports which name the same individual within a prescribed period of time.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 20, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze S.1920 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine S.1920 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine S.1920 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine S.1920 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.