PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Became Public Law No: 106-258.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Nov 10, 1999
Amends Federal law establishing the Women's Rights National Historic Park in Seneca Falls and Waterloo, New York, to repeal provisions which: (1) prohibit the Secretary of the Interior from acquiring a fee simple interest in the Bloomer and Hunt Houses in Waterloo; and (2) require the Secretary, within two years after acquisition, to remove all structures from the property of the McClintock House in Waterloo that are not relevant to its historic integrity.
People & committees
Sen. Moynihan, Daniel Patrick [D-NY] · D–NY
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Became Public Law No: 106-258.
Became Public Law No: 106-258.
Signed by President.
Signed by President.
Presented to President.
Presented to President.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 404 - 9, 1 Present (Roll no. 435). (text: CR H6875)
House roll call 435 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 404 - 9, 1 Present (Roll no. 435).(text: CR H6875)
House roll call 435 · Individual votesConsidered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H6885-6886)
At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on S. 1910.
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H6875-6876)
Mr. Hansen moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.
Referred to the Subcommittee on National Parks and Public Lands.
Referred to the House Committee on Resources.
Received in the House.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Passed Senate with amendments by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2811; text of measure as passed Senate: CR S2811)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with amendments by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S2811; text of measure as passed Senate: CR S2811)
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 498.
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported to Senate by Senator Murkowski with amendments. With written report No. 106-268.
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported to Senate by Senator Murkowski with amendments. With written report No. 106-268.
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported with amendments favorably.
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on National Parks, Historic Preservation, and Recreation. Hearings held. With printed Hearing: S.Hrg. 106-594.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. (text of measure as introduced: CR S14558)
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S14558)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.1910 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.1910 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.1910 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.1910 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.