Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe Equitable Compensation Act
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 687.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Apr 2, 1998
Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe Equitable Compensation Act - Directs the Secretary of the Treasury (Secretary) to establish in the consolidated account for tribal trust funds a dual cash account to be known as the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribal Recovery Account. Establishes a schedule under which the Secretary shall deposit specified amounts into the fund from the receipts of the power program of the Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin Program. Authorizes the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe to withdraw funds held in trust by the United States and managed by the Secretary of the Interior through the Office of Trust Fund Management. Provides for interest payments from the account for the Tribe's use in promoting economic and infrastructure development and educational, health, recreational, and social welfare objectives.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Jun 20, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze S.1905 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine S.1905 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine S.1905 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine S.1905 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.