PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Became Public Law No: 103-271.
Congressional Research Service
Version 35 · Passed Senate amended · Apr 21, 1994
Amends Federal law pertaining to the Board of Veterans' Appeals to: (1) remove the 65-person limitation for the Board; (2) allow the Chairman of the Board to designate employees of the Department of Veterans Affairs to serve as acting members of the Board for a period not to exceed 90 days; and (3) include information on such acting members and the number of cases they handled in a required annual report on Board activities. Allows proceedings assigned to the Board to be assigned to one or more members. (Current law requires such decisions by a minimum three-member group.) Outlines provisions relating to: (1) decision reconsideration as ordered by the Chairman; (2) the correction of obvious errors upon Board motion; and (3) appeals procedures.
People & committees
Sen. Rockefeller, John D., IV [D-WV] · D–WV
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Became Public Law No: 103-271.
Became Public Law No: 103-271.
Signed by President.
Signed by President.
Presented to President.
Presented to President.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Senate agreed to the House amendment by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S6968)
Resolving differences -- Senate actions: Senate agreed to the House amendment by Voice Vote.(consideration: CR S6968)
Message on House action received in Senate and at desk: House amendment to Senate bill.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate.
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H4349-4354)
Mr. Montgomery moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
Referred to the House Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Held at the desk.
Received in the House.
Passed Senate with amendments by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S4757-4761)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with amendments by Voice Vote.(consideration: CR S4757-4761)
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 413.
Committee on Veterans. Reported to Senate by Senator Rockefeller with amendments. Without written report.
Committee on Veterans. Reported to Senate by Senator Rockefeller with amendments. Without written report.
Committee on Veterans. Ordered to be reported with amendments favorably.
Committee on Veterans. Hearings held.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S2502-2504)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Jan 14, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.1904 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.1904 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.1904 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.1904 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.