PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Jan 19, 1999
Agricultural Safety Net and Market Competitiveness Act of 1999 - Expresses the sense of the Congress that strategies should be considered to offset extreme income loss by agricultural producers from economic and weather related events. (Sec. 4) Expresses the sense of the Congress that the Federal crop insurance program should be modified to: (1) increase covered commodities; (2) increase access to and affordability of crop insurance products; and (3) protect against multiyear disasters. (Sec. 5) Amends the Federal Crop Insurance Act to include livestock within the crop insurance and revenue insurance pilot programs. (Sec. 6) Amends the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 to direct the Secretary of Agriculture to establish a livestock market mandatory reporting pilot program. (Sec. 7) Amends the Federal Meat Inspection Act to require country of origin labeling for: (1) imported or U.S. beef, lamb, or pork offered for sale as muscle cuts; and (2) imported ground or processed beef, lamb, or pork. (Sec. 8) Directs the President to establish an interagency task force to investigate: (1) potential anticompetitive practices in the meat packing industry; and (2) effects of concentration in the agricultural industry. (Sec. 9) Directs the President to study the link between credit and concentration among agricultural producers, handlers, and processors, including credit eligibility requirements for beginning and alternative management farmers and ranchers. (Sec. 10) Directs the Comptroller General to study potential packer and stockyard anticompetitive practices. (Sec. 11) Amends the Packers and Stockyards Act, 1921 to require dealers and live poultry dealers, packers, stockyard owners, and market agencies to submit copies of business contracts to the Secretary. (Sec. 12) Expresses the sense of the Congress that the Secretary should provide opportunities and incentives for agricultural producers to expand value-added enterprise and new market participation. (Sec. 13) United States Agricultural Products Market Access Act of 1998 - Amends the Trade Act of 1974 to direct the United States Trade Representative to identify countries that deny market access to U.S. agricultural products. (Sec. 14) Sets forth U.S. agricultural trade negotiation goals. (Sec. 15) Directs The United States Trade Representative to consult with the House and Senate agriculture committees prior to initiating agricultural tariff reduction negotiations.
People & committees
Sen. Daschle, Thomas A. [D-SD] · D–SD
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S306)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 20, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.19 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.19 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.19 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.19 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.