PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · May 22, 2025
Axing Nonmarket Tariff Evasion Act or the ANTE Act
This bill authorizes the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) to investigate and take remedial action against covered entities that evade or attempt to evade duties (i.e., tariffs) that were imposed on nonmarket economy countries (e.g., China) by investing in other countries.
Under the bill, a covered entity (e.g., business) (1) is owned, controlled, subject to the jurisdiction or direction of, or operated by a nonmarket economy country; and (2) includes an entity for which, on any date during the most recent 12-month period, at least 25% of the equity interests in such entity were held directly or indirectly by one or more entities organized under the laws of a nonmarket economy country.
Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.
Currently, Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 allows the USTR to impose tariffs in response to actions by foreign countries that violate U.S. rights under international trade agreements or that burden or restrict U.S. commerce in unjustifiable, unreasonable, or discriminatory ways. In 2018, for example, the USTR used Section 301 to impose tariffs on many imports from China.
This bill allows the USTR to investigate whether a covered entity is establishing or has established investments (e.g., manufacturing operations) in another country that is not subject to Section 301 tariffs in order to evade those tariffs. Upon an affirmative determination, the USTR may impose certain remedial measures, such as imposing a tariff equivalent to the original tariff on goods associated with the nonmarket economy country.
People & committees
Sen. Banks, Jim [R-IN] · R–IN
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Jul 30, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.1886 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.1886 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.1886 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.1886 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.