PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

A bill to revise the short title of the Fannie Lou Hamer, Rosa Parks, and Coretta Scott King Voting Rights Act Reauthorization and Amendments Act of 2006.

Became Public Law No: 110-258.

Official summary

Version 49 · Public Law · Jul 1, 2008

(This measure has not been amended since it was passed by the Senate on February 15, 2007. The summary of that version is repeated here.)

Amends the Fannie Lou Hamer, Rosa Parks, and Coretta Scott King Voting Rights Act Reauthorization and Amendments Act of 2006 to change the short title to the Fannie Lou Hamer, Rosa Parks, Coretta Scott King, Cesar E. Chavez, Barbara C. Jordan, William C. Velasquez, and Dr. Hector P. Garcia Voting Rights Act Reauthorization and Amendments Act of 2006.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Salazar, Ken [D-CO] · D–CO

Committees

  • Judiciary Committee
  • Judiciary Committee
5 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Became Public Law No: 110-258.

  2. Became Public Law No: 110-258.

  3. Signed by President.

  4. Signed by President.

  5. Presented to President.

  6. Presented to President.

  7. Cleared for White House.

  8. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  9. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H5449)

  10. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H5449)

  11. DEBATE - The House proceeded with twenty minutes of debate on S. 188.

  12. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H5449-5454)

  13. Ms. Jackson-Lee moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

  14. Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

  15. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  16. Received in the House.

  17. Passed Senate with amendments by Unanimous Consent. (text: CR S2116)

  18. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with amendments by Unanimous Consent.(text: CR S2116)

  19. Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S2115-2116; text of measure as reported in Senate: CR S2115-2116)

  20. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 23.

  21. Committee on the Judiciary. Reported by Senator Leahy with amendments. Without written report.

  22. Committee on the Judiciary. Reported by Senator Leahy with amendments. Without written report.

  23. Committee on the Judiciary. Ordered to be reported with amendments favorably.

  24. Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

  25. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S185-186)

  26. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Aug 10, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.188 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.188 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.188 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.188 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources