PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Afghanistan Accountability Act of 2015

Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

Official summary

Version 01 · Reported to Senate with amendment(s) · Jul 30, 2015

Afghanistan Accountability Act of 2015

TITLE I--EFFECTIVE AFGHANISTAN ASSISTANCE AND ACCOUNTABILITY [sic]

(Sec. 102) This bill expresses the sense of Congress with respect to U.S. assistance and accountability in Afghanistan, including that:

Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.

Read full official summaryShow less

the National Unity Government of Afghanistan has made a substantial commitment to reform that should be supported but also subject to heightened scrutiny by the Afghan people and international donors;

the international community should work closely with the new government in supporting development priorities;

the U.S. government should deepen its dialogue on anti-corruption efforts with the government of Afghanistan, and should encourage Afghanistan's participation in the Open Government Partnership;

the United States should urge the government of Afghanistan to build upon existing anti-money laundering and countering terrorism financing legislation;

in the event of future egregious cases of corruption in Afghanistan the President should impose visa bans and asset freezes on those responsible, especially in instances where U.S. assistance is stolen or misappropriated;

the United States should support the Afghan Parliament to strengthen the legal framework of anti-corruption and anti-money laundering laws;

U.S. assistance to the Afghan judicial system and other Afghan legal institutions that enable private sector development should be prioritized to ensure the protection of private property, the sanctity of contracts, and effective dispute resolution mechanisms for businesses and investors;

the U.S. government should identify opportunities to introduce trade facilitation as part of the economic relationship between the two countries;

the governments of the United States and Afghanistan should work together to identify more Afghan products and raw materials to be included on the United States Generalized System of Preferences treatment list;

the U.S. government should establish a United States-Afghan Tax Commission to help spearhead a successful conclusion of a new Bilateral Tax Agreement similar to the Agreements with several of Afghanistan's neighbors, including Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan, India, and Pakistan;

the American University of Afghanistan is an emerging pillar in Afghanistan's education system; and

the United States should encourage the government of Afghanistan to implement electoral reforms in accordance with the Agreement between the Two Campaign Teams Regarding the Structure of the National Unity Government.

(Sec. 103) It is U.S. policy:

to conduct assistance programs that result in effective development outcomes for the people of Afghanistan while maintaining accountability for U.S. taxpayers;

that all U.S. government agencies and entities working in Afghanistan coordinate plans to develop U.S. policy and assistance programming;

to support the development of effective government of Afghanistan oversight institutions;

to support the development of democratic governing institutions in Afghanistan, promote the development of a growing private sector, and strengthen civil society;

to recognize that Afghanistan's sustainable development is grounded in growing the regional economy, and to support efforts to build strong regional economic connectivity with the country's neighbors;

to support programs that promote private sector job creation in Afghanistan; and

that assistance programs in support of Afghan women and girls remain a U.S. priority.

(Sec. 104) The Department of State shall develop an interagency strategy for U.S. assistance that is sustainable and is not counter-productive to combating corruption in Afghanistan.

The President is authorized to provide technical and financial assistance to official government of Afghanistan anti-corruption and audit institutions and Afghan civil society watchdog groups in support of the anti-corruption priorities identified by the governments of Afghanistan and the United States.

The State Department is urged to provide support for efforts of the government of Afghanistan to improve oversight and accountability of the Afghan National Security Forces, including the Afghan national and local police, and strengthen Afghan civil society and investigative journalists to provide oversight of these institutions.

A Regional Economic Connectivity Fund is established from which funds may be made available to enhance regional economic connectivity between Afghanistan and the countries of South and Central Asia.

(Sec. 105) The State Department shall, annually through 2024, report to Congress listing each individual who the President determines:

is a government of Afghanistan official, a senior associate, or close relative of such an official who is responsible for or complicit in ordering or directing acts of significant corruption, including the expropriation of private or public assets for personal gain, corruption related to government contracts or the extraction of natural resources, bribery, or the facilitation or transfer of the proceeds of corruption to foreign jurisdictions; or

has materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services in support of such an activity.

The Government Accountability Office shall report to Congress on civilian-military assistance efforts in Afghanistan.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Menendez, Robert [D-NJ] · D–NJ

Committees

  • Foreign Affairs Committee
  • Foreign Relations Committee
3 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

  2. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  3. Received in the House.

  4. Passed Senate with an amendment by Voice Vote.

  5. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Voice Vote.

  6. The committee amendment withdrawn by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2576)

  7. Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S2573-2576; text of measure as reported in Senate: CR S2573-2576)

  8. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 189.

  9. Committee on Foreign Relations. Reported by Senator Corker with an amendment. Without written report.

  10. Committee on Foreign Relations. Reported by Senator Corker with an amendment. Without written report.

  11. Committee on Foreign Relations. Ordered to be reported with an amendment favorably.

  12. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.

  13. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Mar 4, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.1875 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.1875 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.1875 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.1875 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources