PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Committee on Indian Affairs. Hearings held.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Mar 26, 1998
Indian Gaming Regulatory Improvement Act of 1998 - Amends the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act. Revises definitions. Redesignates the National Indian Gaming Commission as the National Indian Gaming Regulatory Commission. Revises and expands Commission powers. Directs the Commission to advise the Secretary of the Interior with respect to the establishment of minimum Federal standards for background investigations, internal control systems, and licensing. Requires the Secretary, in accordance with specified negotiated rulemaking procedures, to promulgate such standards. Grants the Commission investigatory authority. Sets forth the regulatory framework for class II and III gaming. Sets forth requirements for: (1) conduct of class I, II, and III gaming on Indian lands; and (2) contract review. Authorizes class III gaming on Indian lands only in accordance with an approved compact between the State and Indian tribe concerned. Prohibits the Secretary from approving a compact if the compact requires State regulation of Indian gaming absent State or Indian tribe consent. Sets forth civil penalty and judicial review provisions. Revises the existing gaming fee structure and raises the ceiling on the maximum amount of fees that may be imposed per fiscal year. Establishes the Indian Gaming Trust Fund, to consist of fees collected from class II and III gaming activities and to be used to fund Commission activities. Changes, from after October 17, 1988, to after this Act's enactment date, the effective date of certain prohibitions on gaming on lands acquired by the Secretary in trust for an Indian tribe. Retains certain exceptions to such prohibitions for the St. Croix Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin and the Miccosukee Tribe of Florida. Authorizes an exception in cases where the use of such lands for gaming purposes is provided for in an approved tribal-State compact. Amends the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act to prohibit former Federal employees from acting as agents or attorneys for clients in connection with matters or decisions involving the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act in which they had personal and substantial involvement while Federal employees.
People & committees
Sen. Campbell, Ben Nighthorse [R-CO] · R–CO
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Committee on Indian Affairs. Hearings held.
Committee on Indian Affairs. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 105-532 PT.1.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S2672-2673)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 21, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.1870 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.1870 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.1870 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.1870 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.