PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

A bill to establish the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, and for other purposes.

Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S4451-4452)

Official summary

Version 01 · Reported to Senate with amendment(s) · May 14, 2002

Establishes a National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, which shall: (1) examine and report on the facts and causes relating to the terrorist attacks against the United States of September 11, 2001; (2) ascertain, evaluate and report on the evidence developed by all relevant Government agencies regarding the facts and circumstances surrounding the attacks; and (3) identify and review the lessons learned regarding the structure and makeup of the Federal Government and, if necessary, of State and local governments and of nongovernmental organizations, with regards to detecting, preventing and responding to such terrorist attacks.(Sec. 5) Empowers the Commission to hold hearings, collect relevant materials, and subpoena witnesses.Applies Federal law to make failure to obey a subpoena by the Commission a misdemeanor crime against Congress punishable by a fine and imprisonment.Permits Commission meetings or portions to be closed to the public for national security reasons. Directs executive departments, agencies and other entities to provide information to the Commission upon request as authorized by law.(Sec. 8) Authorizes Executive departments and agencies to issue security clearances to members of the Commission, except that no individual on the Commission shall receive access to classified information who would not otherwise qualify for such a security clearance.(Sec. 9) Directs the Commission to issue a report to the President and Congress within six months after the first meeting, and a second report a year later, with recommendations for corrective measures.(Sec. 10) Authorizes appropriations.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Lieberman, Joseph I. [D-CT] · D–CT

Committees

  • Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee
22 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S4451-4452)

  2. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 369.

  3. Committee on Governmental Affairs. Reported by Senator Lieberman with amendments. With written report No. 107-150. Additional views filed.

  4. Committee on Governmental Affairs. Reported by Senator Lieberman with amendments. With written report No. 107-150. Additional views filed.

  5. Committee on Governmental Affairs. Ordered to be reported with amendments favorably.

  6. Committee on Governmental Affairs. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 107-379.

  7. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs. (text of measure as introduced: CR S13951-13953)

  8. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S13951)

  9. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.1867 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.1867 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.1867 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.1867 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources