A bill to establish the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, and for other purposes.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S4451-4452)
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 01 · Reported to Senate with amendment(s) · May 14, 2002
Establishes a National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, which shall: (1) examine and report on the facts and causes relating to the terrorist attacks against the United States of September 11, 2001; (2) ascertain, evaluate and report on the evidence developed by all relevant Government agencies regarding the facts and circumstances surrounding the attacks; and (3) identify and review the lessons learned regarding the structure and makeup of the Federal Government and, if necessary, of State and local governments and of nongovernmental organizations, with regards to detecting, preventing and responding to such terrorist attacks.(Sec. 5) Empowers the Commission to hold hearings, collect relevant materials, and subpoena witnesses.Applies Federal law to make failure to obey a subpoena by the Commission a misdemeanor crime against Congress punishable by a fine and imprisonment.Permits Commission meetings or portions to be closed to the public for national security reasons. Directs executive departments, agencies and other entities to provide information to the Commission upon request as authorized by law.(Sec. 8) Authorizes Executive departments and agencies to issue security clearances to members of the Commission, except that no individual on the Commission shall receive access to classified information who would not otherwise qualify for such a security clearance.(Sec. 9) Directs the Commission to issue a report to the President and Congress within six months after the first meeting, and a second report a year later, with recommendations for corrective measures.(Sec. 10) Authorizes appropriations.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze S.1867 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine S.1867 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine S.1867 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine S.1867 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.