PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S8266-8267)
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Mar 26, 1998
Child Health Care Quality Research Improvement Act - Directs the Secretary of Health and Human Services to award at least ten grants annually to eligible public or nonprofit private entities at geographically diverse locations throughout the United States for research training programs dedicated to child health services research training initiatives at the doctoral, post-doctoral, and junior faculty levels. Authorizes appropriations for FY 1999 through 2003. Requires the Secretary to award grants to eligible public or nonprofit entities for the establishment of at least ten national centers for excellence in child health improvement research and five national child health provider quality improvement research networks at geographically diverse locations throughout the United States. Describes eligibility requirements. Authorizes appropriations for FY 1999 through 2003. Requires the Secretary to: (1) provide support to entities with expertise in pediatric quality of care and outcomes research for improving the quality of children's health, especially in high priority areas (areas of compelling scientific or public policy significance); and (2) establish an advisory committee to evaluate progress in such activities and to identify new high priority areas. Authorizes appropriations for FY 1999 through 2003. Directs the Secretary to provide assistance to enable Federal agencies to: (1) conduct ongoing biennial supplements and initiate and maintain a longitudinal study on children's health linked to existing national surveys to provide for reliable national estimates of health care expenditures, cost, use, access, and satisfaction for children and for other related purposes; and (2) develop an ongoing 50-State survey to generate such estimates. Requires the Secretary to award grants to eligible public and nonprofit entities for developing the capacity of local communities to improve child health monitoring. Authorizes appropriations for FY 1999 through 2003. Directs the Secretary to report to the Congress on progress made in pediatric quality of care and outcomes research.
People & committees
Sen. DeWine, Mike [R-OH] · R–OH
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S8266-8267)
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S2661-2662)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 21, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.1866 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.1866 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.1866 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.1866 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.