PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Nov 14, 2003
Office of National Drug Control Policy Reauthorization Act of 2003 - Reauthorizes appropriations for the Office of National Drug Control Policy. Provides for a U.S. Interdiction Coordinator.
Directs: (1) the President to annually submit to Congress a National Drug Control Strategy; and (2) the Director of the Office to submit to Congress a description of a national drug control performance measurement system.
Modifies the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas (HIDTA) Program, including authorizing the Director to use specified funds to respond to emerging drug trafficking threats.
Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.
Dawson Family Community Protection Act - Requires the Director to ensure that specified funds are used in HIDTAs with severe neighborhood safety and illegal drug distribution problems to: (1) ensure neighborhood safety, including the prevention of witness intimidation; and (2) use methods including operation of a toll-free telephone hotline to report illegal drug activity.
Directs that the Counter-Drug Technology Assessment Center be headed by a Chief Scientist.
National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign Reauthorization Act of 2003 - Amends the Drug-Free Media Campaign Act of 1998 to require the Director to determine the overall purposes and strategy of the national media campaign.
Designates a United States Anti-Doping Agency.
Amends the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to authorize the Attorney General to make grants to State or local prosecutors for drug treatment alternative to prison programs.
Anabolic Steroid Control Act of 2003 - Amends the Controlled Substances Act to modify the definition of "anabolic steroid" to include androstenedione and specified chemicals.
People & committees
Sen. Hatch, Orrin G. [R-UT] · R–UT
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S14811-14814)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 10, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.1860 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.1860 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.1860 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.1860 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.