Securities and Exchange Commission Fee Reduction Act of 1996
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Jun 10, 1996
Securities and Exchange Commission Fee Reduction Act of 1996 - Amends the Securities Act of 1933 to: (1) prohibit the minimum required registration fee from exceeding $100 (current law prohibits the minimum fee from being less than $100); and (2) set forth a schedule for general revenue fees and offsetting collection fees in diminishing amounts through FY 2001. (Sec. 3) Amends the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to revise the transaction fee schedule for: (1) exchange-traded securities; (2) off-exchange trades of exchange-registered securities; (3) off-exchange trades of last-sale-reported securities. Declares that such fees are in lieu of, and not in addition to, any fees that the Securities and Exchange Commission is authorized to impose or collect.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 21, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze S.1855 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine S.1855 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine S.1855 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine S.1855 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.