Appalachian Development Highway System Completion Act
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Jan 22, 1997
Appalachian Development Highway System Completion Act - Authorizes appropriations out of the Highway Trust Fund for FY 1998 through 2003 to fund the Federal share of the total estimated cost of completion of construction of the Appalachian development highway authorized by the Appalachian Regional Development Act of 1965. Directs the Secretary of Transportation to: (1) transfer funds made available for such purpose to the Appalachian Regional Commission, which shall be responsible for administration of the funds; and (2) apportion the funds to the 13 States in the Appalachian region in accordance with each State's portion of the total estimated cost of completion. Makes one-sixth of the funds allocated for construction available for obligation in each of such fiscal years. Sets forth provisions regarding the Federal share (80 percent), delegation of responsibility to the States, advance construction, and contract authority.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze S.182 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine S.182 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine S.182 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine S.182 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.