PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Committee on Banking. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 103-510.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Jan 26, 1994
Mutual Depository Institution Conversion Protection Act of 1994 - Amends the Home Owners' Loan Act with respect to conversions from mutual to stock form of ownership by State and Federal savings banks and associations to: (1) subject State institutions to Federal regulations; (2) authorize State regulatory authorities to impose conversion rules more restrictive than the Federal rules; (3) restrict the beneficial interest available to insider transactions pursuant to such conversions to the same interest available to non-insiders; (4) prohibit for one year compensation to savings institution personnel which exceeds that received before the conversion date; and (5) require the Director of the Office of Thrift Supervision to establish aggregate limits on the beneficial interests of insiders pursuant to such conversions. Directs the Secretary of the Treasury to study and report to the Congress on the adequacy of Federal regulations and disclosure requirements regarding such conversions.
People & committees
Sen. Riegle, Donald W., Jr. [D-MI] · D–MI
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Committee on Banking. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 103-510.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S178-179)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 26, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.1801 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.1801 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.1801 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.1801 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.