Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S5173-5174)
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Jul 16, 2015
Community Bank Sensible Regulation Act of 2015
This bill amends the following Acts governing insured depository institutions to authorize the respective regulatory agencies to exempt from their regulatory purview depository institutions having less than $10 billion in total assets after the agencies have considered specified factors:
the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (insured depository institutions),
Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.
Read full official summaryShow less
the Revised Statutes (national banks),
the Home Owners' Loan Act (savings associations, savings and loan holding companies, and mutual holding company),
the Federal Reserve Act (state member banks), and
the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (bank holding companies).
When issuing an exemption from a provision or rule the regulatory agencies must consider the extent to which:
the provision or rule would impose an unnecessary or undue burden or cost on the depository institution;
the provision or rule is unnecessary or unwarranted to promote the safety and soundness of the depository institution; and
the exemption is necessary, appropriate, or consistent with the public interest.
The asset threshold of such depository institutions shall increase annually at a percentage equal to the percentage change in the total aggregate assets of insured depository institutions for each 12-month period ending in December of each year, rounded to the nearest $10 million.
Source last updated: Aug 12, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze S.1799 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine S.1799 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine S.1799 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine S.1799 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.