PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Reduction in Tobacco Use and Regulation of Tobacco Products in Indian Country Act of 1998

Committee on Indian Affairs. Ordered to be reported with amendments favorably.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Mar 19, 1998

Reduction in Tobacco Use and Regulation of Tobacco Products in Indian Country Act of 1998 - Makes the provisions of any Act enacted to effect the national tobacco settlement agreement of June 20, 1997, applicable to the manufacture, distribution, or sale of tobacco or tobacco products within the boundaries of Indian reservations or on lands within the jurisdiction of an Indian tribe or organization, with exceptions for religious or traditional uses. Makes Indian tribes or organizations that engage in the manufacture of tobacco products subject to liability for any fee payments levied on other manufacturers for purposes of any tobacco trust fund. Subjects tribes or organizations that do not pay to surcharges applicable to nonparticipating manufacturers under Acts effecting the settlement. Requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services to promulgate regulations to waive requirements of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) with respect to tobacco products manufactured, distributed, or sold on Indian reservations or lands, as appropriate to comply with this Act. Provides that responsibility for enforcing such regulations with respect to tobacco-related activities that take place on Indian reservations or lands shall vest in: (1) the Indian tribe or organization involved; (2) the State within which the lands of the tribe or organization are located pursuant to a voluntary cooperative agreement; or (3) the Secretary. Directs the Secretary to: (1) provide assistance to Indian tribes or organizations for meeting and enforcing requirements under such regulations, subject to eligibility requirements; and (2) implement and enforce such regulations on behalf of tribes or organizations that are unwilling or unqualified to do so. Applies requirements of the FDCA or any Act effecting the settlement with respect to licensing of tobacco retailers to retailers on Indian reservations or lands. Directs the Secretary to: (1) promulgate regulations to authorize Indian tribes or organizations to implement tobacco product licensing programs on Indian reservations or lands; and (2) implement such requirements on behalf of unqualified tribes or organizations. Requires the terms and standards contained in the model State law in any Act effecting the settlement to constitute the minimum Federal regulations that tribes or organizations must enact to assume responsibility for licensing and regulation or tobacco-related activities. Requires the Secretary to award grants to Indian tribes or organizations with approved anti-smoking plans. Reduces the public health payment otherwise payable to the State in which the service areas of such tribes or organizations are located by the amount of such grants. Requires grants to be used to reimburse tribes for smoking-related health expenditures. Makes amounts available from the tobacco trust fund for the Indian Health Service and Indian tribes and organizations for reducing tobacco consumption, promoting smoking cessation, and funding related activities.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Campbell, Ben Nighthorse [R-CO] · R–CO

Committees

  • Indian Affairs Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Committee on Indian Affairs. Ordered to be reported with amendments favorably.

    2. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs.

    3. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S2296)

    4. Introduced in Senate

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

    Source last updated: Aug 21, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze S.1797 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine S.1797 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine S.1797 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine S.1797 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources