PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Became Public Law No: 103-195.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Nov 22, 1993
Authorizes the city of Slidell, Louisiana, to submit, within ten days of enactment of this Act, a final statement of objectives with respect to a FY 1994 community development block grant. Directs the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to consider and accept such final statement.
People & committees
Sen. Johnston, J. Bennett [D-LA] · D–LA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Became Public Law No: 103-195.
Became Public Law No: 103-195.
Signed by President.
Signed by President.
Presented to President.
Presented to President.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Senate agreed the House amendment by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S17230)
Resolving differences -- Senate actions: Senate agreed the House amendment by Voice Vote.(consideration: CR S17230)
Message on House action received in Senate and at desk: House amendment to Senate bill.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On passage Passed without objection.
Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed without objection.
Mr. Gonzalez asked unanimous consent to take from the Speaker's table and consider.
Considered by unanimous consent. (consideration: 11/22/93 CR H10955-10956)
Received in the House.
Passed Senate with amendments by Voice Vote.
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with amendments by Voice Vote.
Measure laid before Senate. (consideration: CR S16982)
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Sep 25, 2021. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.1769 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.1769 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.1769 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.1769 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.