PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Committee on Governmental Affairs. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 105-495.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Mar 16, 1998
Vacancies Clarification Act of 1998 - Revises provisions regarding the filling of Federal vacancies to authorize the President, if an appointed officer of an executive agency (other than the General Accounting Office (GAO)) dies, resigns, or is otherwise unable to perform office functions, to direct a person described by this Act to perform such functions temporarily in an acting capacity, subject to specified time limitations. Describes a person authorized to perform such functions as one: (1) in the position of first assistant to the officer unable to perform; or (2) in an office for which appointment by the President, with the advice and consent of the Senate, is required. Applies vacancy provisions of the Federal judicial code with respect to the office of the Attorney General. Retains existing time limitations on temporary appointments. Makes vacancy and time limitation provisions applicable to any affected office for which an advice and consent appointment is required unless: (1) another statutory provision expressly supersedes such provisions; or (2) the President makes an appointment to fill a vacancy during a Senate recess. Requires an office to remain vacant until a person is appointed if not temporarily filled within 120 days after the date the vacancy occurs. Prohibits acting officers serving in violation of vacancy or time limitation provisions from receiving pay. Requires pay not received to be forfeited and prohibits backpay. Directs the heads of affected executive agencies to submit to the Comptroller General and to the Congress: (1) notification of a vacancy and the date such vacancy occurred immediately upon occurrence of the vacancy; (2) the name of the person serving in an acting capacity and the date such service began immediately upon the designation; (3) the name of any person nominated to fill the vacancy and the date such nomination is submitted immediately upon submission; and (4) the date of a rejection or withdrawal of any nomination immediately upon such action. Requires the Comptroller General to report to the Congress, President, Secretary of the Treasury, and the Office of Personnel Management any determination that an officer is serving longer than the prescribed 120-day period, including exceptions to such period.
People & committees
Sen. Thurmond, Strom [R-SC] · R–SC
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Committee on Governmental Affairs. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 105-495.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S1992-1993)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 21, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.1764 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.1764 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.1764 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.1764 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.