Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Oct 20, 1999
Rural Hospital Relief Act of 1999 - Amends title XVIII (Medicare) of the Social Security Act (SSA) to: (1) revise the prospective payment system (PPS) for hospital outpatient department (OPD) services with regard to the calculation of base amounts, in order to eliminate the (unintended) reduction in the conversion factor for the Medicare OPD PPS; (2) exclude certain ambulance services and swing-bed days from the Medicare skilled nursing facility PPS; (3) modify the Medicare rural hospital flexibility program and other related Medicare requirements with regard to criteria for designation as a critical access hospital; (4) reduce from 45 percent to ten percent the amount of bad debts otherwise treated as allowable costs attributable to deductibles and coinsurance amounts under Medicare for cost reporting periods beginning after FY 1999 in determining reasonable costs for hospitals; (5) prohibit the Secretary of Health and Human Services from applying productivity guidelines in determining the reasonable costs of rural health clinics for services furnished in calendar years 1998 through 2001; and (6) tie inflation updates for hospitals and skilled nursing facilities located in rural areas to the market basket percentage increase for them.Amends the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 to establish a temporary limit on reductions in Federal payments for covered OPD services furnished by a hospital in a rural area during a calendar year.Provides that the entire amount necessary to carry out this Act and the amendments made by it shall be available only to the extent that an official budget request for the entire amount, that includes designation of the entire amount of the request as an emergency requirement under the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (Gramm- Rudman-Hollings Act), as amended, is transmitted by the President to Congress, if that entire amount is designated by Congress as an emergency requirement.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 20, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze S.1757 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine S.1757 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine S.1757 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine S.1757 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.