PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Identity Theft Victims Assistance Act of 2002

Referred to the Subcommittee on Financial Institutions and Consumer Credit, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Chairman.

Official summary

Version 35 · Passed Senate amended · Nov 14, 2002

Identity Theft Victims Assistance Act of 2002 - (Sec. 3) Amends the Federal criminal code to require a business entity that possesses information relating to an alleged identity theft, or that has entered into a transaction, provided credit, accepted payment, or otherwise done business with a person that has made unauthorized use of the victim's means of identification, within 20 days after the receipt of a victim's written request, to provide without charge a copy of all application and transaction information related to the alleged identity theft to: (1) the victim; (2) any Federal, State, or local governing law enforcement agency or officer specified by the victim; or (3) any law enforcement agency investigating the identity theft and authorized by the victim to take receipt of records provided under this section.Requires the victim to provide specified proof of identity (such as the presentation of a government-issued identification card) and of a claim of identity theft (such as a copy of a police report or standardized affidavit made available by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC)). Limits the liability of a business entity for good faith disclosures meeting specified requirements.Sets forth provisions regarding authority of such entity to decline to provide information and affirmative defenses.Authorizes State attorneys general to bring civil actions on behalf of State residents where an interest of a resident has been, or is threatened to be, adversely affected by a violation of this section by a business entity. Requires the State attorney general to provide written notice of the action to the Attorney General of the United States, who shall have the right to intervene in that action.(Sec. 4) Amends the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) to require a consumer reporting agency, within 30 days of receiving proof of the identity of a consumer and an official copy of a police report evidencing the claim of identity theft, to block the reporting of any information identified by the consumer in the consumer's file resulting from the identity theft so that the information cannot be reported. Sets forth circumstances under which the agency may decline to block or rescind any block of consumer information. Requires the affected consumer shall be notified promptly if the block is declined or rescinded.Provides that a consumer reporting agency shall not be required to comply when it is issuing information for authorizations for the purpose of approving or processing negotiable instruments, electronic funds transfers, or similar methods of payment, based solely on negative information. Sets forth requirements regarding resellers and penalties for false claims of identity theft.Makes the statute of limitations four years from the date of the violation if the plaintiff: (1) is the victim of an identity theft; or (2) has reasonable grounds to believe that the plaintiff is the victim of an identity theft and has not materially and willfully misrepresented such a claim.(Sec. 5) Amends the Internet False Identification Prevention Act of 2000 to include the Chairman of the FTC, the Postmaster General, and the Commissioner of the U.S. Customs Service on the Coordinating Committee on False Identification. Extends the termination date for the Committee.Requires the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Treasury, at the end of each year of the Committee's existence, to report on its activities to the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, and to the House Committee on Financial Services (in addition to the House and Senate Judiciary Committees, as under current law). Requires that report to include: (1) a comprehensive description of Federal assistance provided to State and local law enforcement agencies to address identity theft; (2) a comprehensive description of coordination activities between Federal, State, and local law enforcement agencies that address identity theft; and (3) recommendations in the President's discretion for certain legislative or administrative changes.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Cantwell, Maria [D-WA] · D–WA

Committees

  • Financial Services Committee
  • Judiciary Committee
  • Judiciary Committee
4 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Referred to the Subcommittee on Financial Institutions and Consumer Credit, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Chairman.

  2. Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  3. Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  4. Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  5. Received in the House.

  6. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  7. Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent. (text: CR S11053-11055)

  8. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.(text: CR S11053-11055)

  9. Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S11052-11056; text of measure as reported in Senate: CR S11052-11053)

  10. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 382.

  11. Committee on the Judiciary. Reported by Senator Leahy with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.

  12. Committee on the Judiciary. Reported by Senator Leahy with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.

  13. Committee on the Judiciary. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.

  14. Committee on the Judiciary Subcommittee on Technology, Terrorism, and Government Information. Hearings held.

  15. Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

  16. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S12162-12163)

  17. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Aug 10, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.1742 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.1742 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.1742 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.1742 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources