Referred to Subcommittee on Parks, Preservation and Recreation.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · May 8, 1996
Yellowstone Protection Act of 1996 - Provides that specified lands located upstream of Yellowstone National Park, Absaroka-Beartooth National Wilderness Area, and the Clarks Fork of the Yellowstone National Wild and Scenic River within the Gallatin and Custer National Forests in Montana (the Area) that are segregated from entry under the general mining laws pursuant to executive order shall not be: (1) open to location of mining claims under U.S. general mining laws; (2) available for leasing under U.S. mineral and geothermal leasing laws; and (3) available for disposal of mineral materials under the Materials Act of 1947. Prohibits: (1) patents under the general mining laws from being issued for claims located in the Area; (2) Federal lands within such Area from being used in connection with mining related activities, except for reclamation; or (3) Federal departments or agencies from assisting in the development or construction of impoundment structures for the storage of mine tailings, work camps, powerplants, electrical transmission lines, gravel or rock borrow pits or mills within the Area. Provides that nothing in this Act shall limit reclamation. Subjects any mining or mining related activities occurring in the Area to operation and reclamation requirements established by the Secretary of Agriculture. Requires the Secretary of the Interior to review mining claims within the Area and to declare invalid claims null and void. Prohibits the Secretary of Agriculture from approving a plan for mining operation activities within the Area that: (1) threaten to pollute groundwater or surface water; or (2) require the perpetual treatment of acid mine pollution of surface or groundwater resources. Sets forth plan approval procedures.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze S.1737 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine S.1737 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine S.1737 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine S.1737 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.