PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Became Public Law No: 109-229.
Congressional Research Service
Version 49 · Public Law · May 31, 2006
(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The expanded summary of the Senate reported version is repeated here.)
Amends federal civil service law to require the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), after consultation with the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, to allow federal judicial branch employees to participate in any emergency leave transfer programs for disasters and emergencies.
People & committees
Sen. Collins, Susan M. [R-ME] · R–ME
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Became Public Law No: 109-229.
Became Public Law No: 109-229.
Signed by President.
Signed by President.
Presented to President.
Presented to President.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H2983)
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H2983)
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on S. 1736.
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H2983-2984)
Mr. Shays moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 251.
Reported by the Committee on Government Reform. H. Rept. 109-449.
Reported by the Committee on Government Reform. H. Rept. 109-449.
Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
By Senator Collins from Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs filed written report. Report No. 109-158.
By Senator Collins from Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs filed written report. Report No. 109-158.
Referred to the House Committee on Government Reform.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Received in the House.
Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S11595; text as passed Senate: CR S11595)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S11595; text as passed Senate: CR S11595)
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 227.
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Reported by Senator Collins without amendment. Without written report.
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Reported by Senator Collins without amendment. Without written report.
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.1736 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.1736 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.1736 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.1736 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.