PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

A bill to amend the Thomas Jefferson Commemoration Commission Act to extend the deadlines for reports.

Became Public Law No: 103-191.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Nov 19, 1993

Amends the Thomas Jefferson Commemoration Commission Act to extend the deadlines for the Commission's interim and final reports to the President and the Congress to March 15, 1994, and December 31, 1994. Extends the deadline for the Inspector General of the General Services Administration to report to the President and the Congress on the results of any audit of the financial transactions of the Commission to March 15, 1994 (and to March 3, 1995, for the report on any such audit of transactions between March 15, 1994, and December 31, 1994).

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Robb, Charles S. [D-VA] · D–VA

Committees

  • Judiciary Committee
1 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Became Public Law No: 103-191.

  2. Became Public Law No: 103-191.

  3. Signed by President.

  4. Signed by President.

  5. Presented to President.

  6. Presented to President.

  7. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  8. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.

  9. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.

  10. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate.

  11. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H10575-10576)

  12. Mr. Sawyer moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

  13. Received in the House.

  14. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  15. Passed Senate without amendment by Voice Vote.

  16. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Voice Vote.

  17. Senate Committee on Judiciary discharged by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S16893)

  18. Senate Committee on Judiciary discharged by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S16893)

  19. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.

  20. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S16464-16465)

  21. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Aug 10, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.1716 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.1716 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.1716 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.1716 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources