PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

A bill to provide for the installation of a plaque to honor Dr. James Harvey Early in the Williamsburg, Kentucky Post Office Building.

Became Public Law No: 107-120.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Nov 15, 2001

Directs the United States Postmaster General to install a plaque to honor Dr. James Harvey Early in the Williamsburg, Kentucky, Post Office Building located at 1000 North Highway 23 West, Williamsburg, Kentucky.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. McConnell, Mitch [R-KY] · R–KY

Committees

  • Oversight and Government Reform Committee
  • Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Became Public Law No: 107-120.

    2. Became Public Law No: 107-120.

    3. Signed by President.

    4. Signed by President.

    5. Presented to President.

    6. Presented to President.

    7. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    8. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR 11/19/2001 H10363)

    9. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR 11/19/2001 H10363)

    10. Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H10935)

    11. At the conclusion of debate, the chair put the question on the motion to suspend the rules. Mr. Davis (IL) objected to the vote on the grounds that a quorum was not present. Further proceedings on the motion were postponed. The point of no quorum was withdrawn.

    12. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on S. 1714.

    13. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H10363-10364)

    14. Mrs. Davis, Jo Ann moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

    15. Referred to the House Committee on Government Reform.

    16. Received in the House.

    17. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

    18. Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (text: CR S12578)

    19. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(text: CR S12578)

    20. Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs discharged by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S12577-12578)

    21. Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs discharged by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S12577-12578)

    22. Committee on Governmental Affairs referred to Subcommittee on International Security, Proliferation and Federal Services.

    23. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs. (text of measure as introduced: CR S11951)

    24. Introduced in Senate

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

    Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze S.1714 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine S.1714 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine S.1714 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine S.1714 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources