PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Retirement Coverage Error Correction Act of 1998

Subcommittee on International Security. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 105-639.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Mar 4, 1998

Retirement Coverage Error Correction Act of 1998 - Provides for the correction of Federal retirement coverage errors (with the exception of errors in effect for a period of less than three years of employee service after December 31, 1986) concerning: (1) social security-only covered employees who were erroneously CSRS (Civil Service Retirement System) covered or CSRS Offset covered; (2) social security-only covered employees not eligible to elect FERS (Federal Employees Retirement System) who were erroneously FERS covered; (3) CSRS covered, CSRS Offset covered, and FERS eligible social security-only covered employees who were erroneously FERS covered without an election; (4) FERS covered current and former employees who were erroneously CSRS covered or CSRS Offset covered; and (5) annuitants and survivors in cases where FERS covered employees were erroneously CSRS covered or CSRS Offset covered. (Sec. 10) Sets forth provisions concerning the social security coverage of employees erroneously subject to CSRS coverage and retroactively converted to CSRS Offset coverage, FERS coverage, or social security-only coverage. (Sec. 11) Sets forth requirements regarding: (1) future CSRS coverage determinations; (2) specified discretionary actions to be taken by the OPM Director (requires a certain report to the Congress); (3) Thrift Savings Plan treatment for certain individuals; (4) the authorization of all payments permitted or required by this Act to be paid from the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund and the appropriation of the Fund for such payments; (5) service credit deposits; and (6) regulations.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Cochran, Thad [R-MS] · R–MS

Committees

  • Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee
9 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Subcommittee on International Security. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 105-639.

  2. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs.

  3. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S1348)

  4. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Aug 21, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.1710 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.1710 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.1710 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.1710 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources