S.1684 / 107th Congress

A bill to provide a 1-year extension of the date for compliance by certain covered entities with the administrative simplification standards for electronic transactions and code sets issued in accordance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996.

Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.

S.1684 through Congress

S.1684 keeps its number as it moves between the House and Senate.

SenateNov 27, 2001Passed the billUnanimous consentOfficial record

Major milestones in the imported record. See all actions.

Latest House action · Dec 10, 2001

Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.

All House actions on S.1684 Read the House text

Separate related House measures (1)

These are different measures identified as related by Congress.gov. Their text and outcomes may differ; they are not the House stage of S.1684.

Related House bill: H.R.3323 Administrative Simplification Compliance Act

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Nov 14, 2001

See summary of: S. 1588

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Sen. Dorgan, Byron L. [D-ND] · D–ND

Committees

Energy and Commerce Committee
Ways and Means Committee
Finance Committee

18 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

Dec 10, 2001
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Nov 28, 2001
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Nov 28, 2001
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Nov 28, 2001
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Nov 28, 2001
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Nov 28, 2001
Received in the House.
Nov 27, 2001
Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (text as passed Senate: CR S12059-12060)
Nov 27, 2001
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(text as passed Senate: CR S12059-12060)
Nov 27, 2001
Senate Committee on Finance discharged by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S12059-12060)
Nov 27, 2001
Senate Committee on Finance discharged by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S12059-12060)
Nov 14, 2001
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Nov 14, 2001
Introduced in Senate

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Referred in House · Nov 28, 2001 Formatted Text PDF
Engrossed in Senate · Nov 27, 2001 Formatted Text PDF
Introduced in Senate · Nov 14, 2001 Formatted Text PDF

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Jan 14, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.1684 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss S.1684, 107th Congress: A bill to provide a 1-year extension of the date for compliance by certain covered entities with the administrative simplification standards for electronic transactions and code sets issued in accordance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/107th-congress/senate-bill/1684

Text version to examine: Referred in House · 2001-11-28.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/107/bills/s1684/BILLS-107s1684rfh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-01-14T19:03:27Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze S.1684 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.1684 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss S.1684, 107th Congress: A bill to provide a 1-year extension of the date for compliance by certain covered entities with the administrative simplification standards for electronic transactions and code sets issued in accordance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/107th-congress/senate-bill/1684

Text version to examine: Referred in House · 2001-11-28.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/107/bills/s1684/BILLS-107s1684rfh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-01-14T19:03:27Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine S.1684 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.1684 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss S.1684, 107th Congress: A bill to provide a 1-year extension of the date for compliance by certain covered entities with the administrative simplification standards for electronic transactions and code sets issued in accordance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/107th-congress/senate-bill/1684

Text version to examine: Referred in House · 2001-11-28.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/107/bills/s1684/BILLS-107s1684rfh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-01-14T19:03:27Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine S.1684 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.1684 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss S.1684, 107th Congress: A bill to provide a 1-year extension of the date for compliance by certain covered entities with the administrative simplification standards for electronic transactions and code sets issued in accordance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/107th-congress/senate-bill/1684

Text version to examine: Referred in House · 2001-11-28.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/107/bills/s1684/BILLS-107s1684rfh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-01-14T19:03:27Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine S.1684 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.