PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Read twice and referred to the Committee on Intelligence.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Apr 17, 1996
TABLE OF CONTENTS: Title I: Assessment of Programs and Policies for Combatting Proliferation Title II: Other Matters Combatting Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction Act of 1996 - Title I: Assessment of Programs and Policies for Combatting Proliferation - Establishes the Commission on Programs and Policies for Combatting the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction to study and report recommendations to the Congress for improving U.S. organizations, policies, and programs relating to combatting the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. Authorizes appropriations. Title II: Other Matters - Requires the Director of Central Intelligence to report to the Congress every six months on: (1) the acquisition by foreign countries of technology relating to weapons of mass destruction and advanced conventional munitions; and (2) trends in such acquisition by such countries.
People & committees
Sen. Specter, Arlen [R-PA] · R–PA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Intelligence.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S3488-3489)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 21, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.1681 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.1681 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.1681 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.1681 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.