A bill to establish a child centered program, and for other purposes.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on HELP.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Sep 30, 1999
Amends the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA) to establish a new subpart 3, Child Centered Program, under part A (Improving Basic Programs Operated by Local Educational Agencies) of title I (Helping Disadvantaged Children Meet High Standards).Allows States and participating local educational agencies (LEAs) to use funds under subpart 1 (Basic Program Requirements) and subpart 2 (Allocations) to carry out such child centered program. Requires States and such LEAs to use certain incentive grant funds to carry out such program.Allows an LEA, if its State does not carry out such a child centered program or have an approved application for a fiscal year, to elect to carry out such a program. Requires the Secretary of Education to provide directly to such LEA the funds it is eligible for under subparts 1 and 2 to carry out such program. Requires participating LEAs to obtain State approval of the submission, but not of the contents, of their applications for such program assistance.Requires the Secretary to award incentive grants to States (or directly to LEAs under the described conditions) that elect to carry out such a child centered program and have an approved application. Bases such incentive grant amounts on relative share of funds received under subparts 1 and 2. Authorizes appropriations for such incentive grants.Sets forth requirements for State and LEA use of child centered program funds from subparts 1 and 2 and incentive grants, including: (1) establishing per-pupil amounts which may be varied because of certain factors; and (2) providing supplemental education services directly or through a contractor, or, if requested and selected by the child's parent or legal guardian, a tutorial assistance provider, another public school, or a private school.Allows use of child centered program funds for schoolwide programs under specified conditions.Requires that private school children receive comparable services.Requires participating States and LEAs to operate statewide or school-district-wide open enrollment programs. Requires public schools receiving such child centered program funds to carry out parent involvement activities, including annual meetings and information on parents' right to choose to use the per pupil amount to purchase supplemental education services from the specified types of providers.Sets forth requirements for program applications, administration, State and LEA reports, termination authority, and evaluations and reports by the Comptroller General.Prohibits Federal control of specified types of State and local education decisions as a condition for eligibility to receive funds under this Act. Prohibits preemption of a State constitution or statute that pertains to expenditure of State funds in or by religious institutions.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Apr 21, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze S.1677 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine S.1677 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine S.1677 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine S.1677 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.