PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Star Print ordered on Senate Report 103-188.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Nov 18, 1993
Government Streamlining and Reform Act of 1993 - Establishes an independent Commission on Government Streamlining and Reform to examine and make recommendations to reform the organization and operations of the executive branch to improve performance while reducing costs by consolidating redundant programs and agencies, streamlining operations, and promoting economy, efficiency, consistency, and accountability in programs and services. Provides procedures for making and implementing such recommendations. Applies the proceeds from any sale of assets under this Act to reduce the Federal debt. Authorizes appropriations.
People & committees
Sen. Glenn, John H., Jr. [D-OH] · D–OH
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Star Print ordered on Senate Report 103-188.
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 308.
Committee on Governmental Affairs. Original measure reported to Senate by Senator Glenn. With written report No. 103-188.
Committee on Governmental Affairs. Original measure reported to Senate by Senator Glenn. With written report No. 103-188.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S16216-16217)
Introduced in Senate
Committee on Governmental Affairs ordered to be reported an original measure in lieu of S. 101.
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Aug 26, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.1675 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.1675 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.1675 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.1675 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.