PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Livestock Mandatory Reporting Act of 1999

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 296.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Sep 30, 1999

TABLE OF CONTENTS: Title I: Livestock Mandatory Reporting Title II: Related Beef Reporting Provisions Title III: Related Swine Reporting Provisions Title IV: Implementation Livestock Mandatory Reporting Act of 1999 - Title I: Livestock Mandatory Reporting - Amends the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 to define specified terms relating to livestock reporting, including cattle and swine reporting. Requires the Secretary of Agriculture to establish mandatory price reporting programs for live cattle and swine that: (1) provide timely and accurate market information; (2) facilitate informed marketing decisions; and (3) promote competition in the slaughtering industry. Sets forth reporting provisions for the Secretary and packers. Requires mandatory packer reporting of boxed beef sales. Authorizes the Secretary to establish a reporting price information program for lamb. Prohibits the Secretary from charging user or service fees. Requires the Secretary to encourage voluntary reporting by packers not subject to the mandatory requirements of this title. Requires the Secretary to publish at least monthly information on retail prices for food products made from beef, pork, chicken, turkey, veal, or lamb. Title II: Related Beef Reporting Provisions - Amends the Agricultural Trade Act of 1978 to include beef within the agricultural export commodities subject to weekly reporting by the Secretary. (Sec. 202) Requires the Secretary to implement an electronic online system to issue and report on meat and meat product export certificates. (Sec. 203) Requires the Secretary publish information on imports of beef, beef variety meats, and cattle. Authorizes appropriations. Title III: Related Swine Reporting Provisions - Requires the Secretary to publish on a monthly basis the Hogs and Pigs Inventory Report, including a separate category for gestating sows. (Sec. 302) Requires the Secretary to make available to swine producers, packers, and other market participants information on swine slaughter that reflects differences in numbers between barrows and gilts. (Sec. 303) Requires the Secretary to contract for a correlation study and report (and prepare subsequent reports) establishing a baseline and standards for determining and improving average trim loss measurements and processing techniques for swine slaughter. (Sec. 304) Amends the Packers and Stockyards Act, 1921to require the Secretary to establish and maintain a library of each contract type offered by packers to swine producers for the purchase and slaughter of swine, including non-carcass premiums. Authorizes appropriations. Requires the Comptroller General to report on the Secretary's authority and jurisdiction over packers and others involved in procuring, slaughtering, or processing swine, pork, or pork products under specified Acts. (Sec. 305) Authorizes appropriations to carry out activities under this title. Title IV: Implementation - Sets forth implementing provisions. Terminates the provisions of this Act five years after enactment of this Act.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Lugar, Richard G. [R-IN] · R–IN

Committees

  • Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 296.

    2. Committee on Agriculture. Original measure reported to Senate by Senator Lugar. With written report No. 106-168.

    3. Committee on Agriculture. Original measure reported to Senate by Senator Lugar. With written report No. 106-168.

    4. Introduced in Senate

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

    Source last updated: Aug 20, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze S.1672 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine S.1672 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine S.1672 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine S.1672 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources