PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Environmental Protection Partnership Act

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Sep 29, 1999

Environmental Protection Partnership Act - Amends the Federal judicial code to provide that an environmental audit report that is prepared, or a finding, opinion, or other communication that is made, in good faith by a person or government entity and that is related to, and essentially constitutes a part of, an audit report shall not be subject to discovery or any other investigatory procedure or admissible as evidence in any judicial action or administrative proceeding, with exceptions.Makes such provision inapplicable to an audit report if, after an in camera hearing, a judge determines that: (1) the party that initiated the audit expressly waives the protection provided by this Act; (2) the audit provides evidence of noncompliance with a covered Federal law and appropriate efforts to achieve compliance were not promptly initiated and pursued with reasonable diligence; (3) the party that is asserting the applicability of such provision is doing so for a fraudulent purpose; or (4) the audit report or finding was prepared for the purpose of avoiding disclosure of information required for a governmental investigative, administrative, or judicial proceeding that, at the time of preparation, was imminent or in progress.Sets forth provisions regarding waivers and confidential disclosures, seizure of an audit report by law enforcement officials, handling of the report, filing a petition with an appropriate court, in camera hearings, and the burden of proof.Authorizes a judge: (1) after an in camera hearing, to require disclosure of or testimony regarding an audit report or finding for which protection is asserted if the judge determines that the information is not subject to protection under this Act; and (2) to suppress any evidence arising or derived from the failure of a government official to comply with this Act.Prohibits a party that performs an audit from giving testimony concerning the audit in any judicial or administrative proceeding that relates to a non-delegated covered Federal law without the consent of the party that initiated the audit.Provides that if a party discloses information relating to a covered Federal law to an appropriate official of an administering Federal or State agency, the disclosure shall be considered to be a voluntary disclosure, subject to limited immunity protection, regardless of whether the disclosure is required by law, if: (1) the disclosure arises out of a voluntary audit or the operation of a voluntary environmental compliance management system and the disclosure is made promptly after the party receives knowledge of the information; and (2) the party initiates an action to address the issues identified in the disclosure within a reasonable period of time and fulfills other specified requirements.Sets forth provisions regarding: (1) permissible sanctions and admission into evidence; (2) mitigating circumstances; (3) involuntary disclosures; and (4) resolution of immunity disputes.Allows a State law (with exceptions) to provide that, under appropriate conditions, a voluntary audit report, or a finding related to and constituting part of a voluntary audit report, shall not be: (1) subject to discovery or any other investigatory procedure governed by State or local law; or (2) admissible as evidence in any State or local judicial action or administrative proceeding. Provides for limited protection for testimony and for disclosure of voluntary environmental audit information.Prohibits a Federal agency from: (1) refusing to delegate a covered Federal law to a State or local agency; (2) refusing to approve or authorize a State or local program under a covered Federal law because the State has such a law in effect; or (3) taking other actions that would effectively require a State to rescind or limit any protection of such State law.Amends the Small Business Act to include within assistance from small business development centers assistance provided to small businesses in complying with the requirements necessary to receive voluntary audit protection.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Hutchison, Kay Bailey [R-TX] · R–TX

Committees

  • Judiciary Committee
3 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.

  2. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S11644)

  3. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Aug 10, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.1661 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.1661 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.1661 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.1661 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources