PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Appraisal Industry Improvement Act

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · May 7, 2025

Appraisal Industry Improvement Act

This bill revises the eligibility criteria for real estate appraisers who are authorized to perform appraisals for federally related mortgage loans.

As background, the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council’s Appraisal Subcommittee oversees state licensing and certification of appraisers and maintains a registry of appraisers who are eligible to perform federally related appraisals—those tied to mortgages involving federally insured banks, federally backed programs (e.g., programs administered by the Federal Housing Administration), or government sponsored enterprises (e.g., Fannie Mae).

Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.

Read full official summaryShow less

The bill

allows federal employees who are state certified or licensed as an appraiser to perform federally related appraisals in states and territories other than the state or territory in which they are certified or licensed,

requires appraisers to meet competency requirements established in the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice, and

prohibits an appraiser who is only certified by a nationally recognized professional appraisal organization from performing federally related appraisals. 

The bill also establishes requirements for qualifying education for these appraisers.

The bill expands the national registry of state certified and licensed appraisers to include credentialed trainees. The bill also allows state certified appraisers to use the assistance of a credentialed trainee or an unlicensed trainee.

Finally, under the bill, the subcommittee (1) must make grants to state certifying and licensing agencies for the purpose of addressing appraiser workforce needs, and (2) may decrease certain fees for appraisal management companies if the subcommittee determines that the fees result in adverse consequences or are not appropriately tailored.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Cramer, Kevin [R-ND] · R–ND

Committees

  • Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee
1 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.

  2. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: May 5, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.1635 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.1635 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.1635 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.1635 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources