PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

A bill to amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act to extend the deadline for submission of State recommendations of local governments to receive assistance of predisaster hazard mitigation and to authorize the President to provide additional repair assistance to individuals and households.

Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Nov 5, 2001

Amends the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act to: (1) extend for FY 2002 the deadline for submission of State recommendations of local governments to receive financial and technical assistance for cost-effective pre-disaster hazard mitigation measures that are designed to reduce injuries, loss of life, and damage and destruction of property; and (2) authorize the President to provide additional assistance for the repair of owner-occupied private residences, utilities, and residential infrastructure damaged by a major disaster to individuals and households that are unable to complete such repairs through the use of insurance proceeds, loans, or other means, including assistance from the Small Business Administration.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Jeffords, James M. [I-VT] · I–VT

Committees

  • Transportation and Infrastructure Committee
  • Environment and Public Works Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.

    2. Received in the House.

    3. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

    4. Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S10472-10473; text as passed Senate: CR S10473)

    5. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S10472-10473; text as passed Senate: CR S10473)

    6. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 284.

    7. Committee on Environment and Public Works. Reported by Senator Jeffords without amendment. With written report No. 107-124.

    8. Committee on Environment and Public Works. Reported by Senator Jeffords without amendment. With written report No. 107-124.

    9. Committee on Environment and Public Works. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.

    10. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.

    11. Introduced in Senate

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

    Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze S.1632 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine S.1632 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine S.1632 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine S.1632 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources