PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

An original bill to amend title 38, United States Code, to permit the burial in cemeteries of the National Cemetery System of certain deceased Reservists and the dependents of such Reservists.

Indefinitely postponed by Senate by Unanimous Consent.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Nov 4, 1993

Extends eligibility for burial in a national cemetery to any member or former member of the armed forces (and his or her dependents) who has performed at least 20 years of service under honorable conditions and who is eligible for retired pay.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Rockefeller, John D., IV [D-WV] · D–WV

Committees

  • Veterans' Affairs Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Indefinitely postponed by Senate by Unanimous Consent.

    2. Senate passed companion measure H.R. 821 in lieu of this measure by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR 11/10/93 S15636-15637)

    3. Senate incorporated this measure in H.R. 821 as an amendment.

    4. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 262.

    5. Committee on Veterans. Original measure reported to Senate by Senator Rockefeller. Without written report.

    6. Committee on Veterans. Original measure reported to Senate by Senator Rockefeller. Without written report.

    7. Introduced in Senate

    8. Committee on Veterans ordered to be reported an original measure.

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    Source last updated: Jan 14, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze S.1620 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine S.1620 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine S.1620 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine S.1620 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources