A bill to authorize the exchange of existing Federal oil and gas leases in the State of Montana, located in the Lewis and Clark National Forest and the Flathead National Forest, for credits in future Federal oil and gas lease sales in the Gulf of Mexico, and for other purposes.
Referred to Subcommittee on Forests and Public Lands.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Feb 5, 1998
Authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to exchange certain Federal oil and gas leases in a specified exchange area in the State of Montana for credits that may be used for: (1) bids in Federal oil and gas lease sales, or for royalty and rentals due under Federal leases in the central and western planning areas of the Gulf of Mexico for leases outside a specified zone; and (2) bid, royalty or rental payments due under Federal oil and gas leases on Federal land in the State of Montana. Provides that the amount of such credits shall be based on investments made in lease acquisition and development before the date of enactment of this Act and agreed to by the Secretary and the leaseholder. Withdraws such exchange area from: (1) location and entry under the mining laws; and (2) leasing under the mineral leasing laws. Directs the Secretary to pay to the State of Montana the amount it would have received in cash but for the leaseholder's use of such credit to pay rentals or royalties on a Federal oil or gas lease on Federal land in Montana.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze S.1616 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine S.1616 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine S.1616 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine S.1616 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.