PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Committee on Governmental Affairs. Provisions of the bill were incorporated in S. 993, as reported.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Oct 29, 1993
Small Governments Regulatory Improvement and Innovation Act of 1993 - Requires agency heads to: (1) issue guidelines to ensure agency implementation of regulatory function analysis requirements under current Federal law; and (2) develop a plan to inform, educate, and advise small entities on compliance with any rule with a significant impact on them. Establishes in each agency the position of Small Government Coordinator to: (1) communicate the small government perspective on agency rules and policies during their development; (2) oversee and report to the agency head on agency efforts to comply with regulatory function analysis requirements as they apply to small governmental jurisdictions; (3) advise the agency head on establishing electronic or other means of information collection to gather data on small governments; (4) advise the agency head and the OMB Director on the development and implementation of the pilot program established pursuant to such requirements; and (5) provide technical assistance to small governments on compliance with agency regulations. Requires the OMB Director to: (1) delegate responsibility for the implementation of all his or her duties under this Act to the Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs; (2) issue agency guidelines on the identification of rules having a significant impact on small entities; (3) monitor agency compliance with this Act; and (4) establish pilot programs to test innovative, more flexible approaches to reduce burdens on small entities while meeting overall statutory goals and objectives. Establishes a Small Governments Advisory Council to perform various specified duties, including developing proposals for : (1) changes in the regulatory policies and activities of any agency which carries out the purposes of this Act; and (2) eliminating excessive or unnecessary regulatory burdens placed on small governments. Authorizes appropriations. Amends Federal law to include Indian tribes within the purview of regulatory function analysis requirements.
People & committees
Sen. Glenn, John H., Jr. [D-OH] · D–OH
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Committee on Governmental Affairs. Provisions of the bill were incorporated in S. 993, as reported.
Committee on Governmental Affairs. Hearings held.
Committee on Governmental Affairs. Hearings held.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S14706)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 26, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.1604 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.1604 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.1604 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.1604 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.